 |
|
What would have been cheaper AND more effective
Posted on: February 7, 2019 at 15:54:35 CT
JG MU
Posts:
247536
Member For:
20.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
30
towards terrorism in 2001?
A) invasions of Afghanistan and later Iraq, Libya, Syria,
Venezuela etc
B) transition to clean and renewable energies 100% for America, access for the entire world's population to potable water, electricity, food security and illiteracy programs
Yeah its not even close, yet still we have the song and dance of the usual suspects.
Note: I'm not saying we even should have done B, I'm just pointing out it would have been both cheaper and more effective than A, and thats just on the terrorism argument- discounting all the other many benefits.
A) invasions of Afghanistan and later Iraq, Libya, Syria,
Venezuela etc
B) transition to clean and renewable energies 100% for America, access for the entire world's population to potable water, electricity, food security and illiteracy programs
Yeah its not even close, yet still we have the song and dance of the usual suspects.
Note: I'm not saying we even should have done B, I'm just pointing out it would have been both cheaper and more effective than A, and thats just on the terrorism argument- discounting all the other many benefits.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
What would have been cheaper AND more effective - JG MU - 2/7 15:54:35