Welcome Guest

Yes, it is. I was distinguishing between ground troops

Posted on: January 16, 2019 at 11:42:13 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44902

Member For:

13.48 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

and all troops in Syria. GAT didn't understand what I wrote and ran full bore with it.

If GAT (or you) would just simply remember what I've said many many times on this Board, there wouldn't have been a miscommunication here.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

There should be no US ground troops in Syria - Spanky KU - 1/16 09:32:50

How about Germany? - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/16 10:04:12

There should be no troops, period. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/16 09:38:40

Presumably, for the sake of consistency, you would - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:40:50

Yes, I feel the same way about all aggressive troops - ummmm MU - 1/16 09:45:53

Yet, seem to ignore that without our troops we - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:48:32

Defensive vs. Aggressive, GAT (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:05:32

we were the aggressors. rebels. revolutionaries. - blake1771 KC - 1/16 12:55:35

Thats not what you said. nm - redngray MU - 1/16 11:39:41

Yes it was (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/16 12:09:10

Yes, it is. I was distinguishing between ground troops - ummmm MU - 1/16 11:42:13

While once again ignoring my request, how can - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 10:22:56

There's a difference between defensive and aggressive - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:24:50

Nope... defensive troops are aggressive also - Spanky KU - 1/16 10:50:53

That's not what I meant Spanky, and I think you know that.(nm) - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:51:25

He does - pickle MU

- 1/16 12:08:29

and I think you knew what GAT meant also - Spanky KU - 1/16 11:49:36

Yeah, and I tried to help him back to what I meant - ummmm MU - 1/16 11:51:41

alas, you chose to use incorrect words in your attempt - Spanky KU - 1/16 12:02:24

I see his error, alright (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/16 12:09:37

Wrong board - Spanky KU - 1/16 12:17:33

Was there a US army prior to the Revolutionary War?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/16 09:51:45

No. Your conclusion?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:54:19

So maintaining a large standing army was not needed.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/16 10:06:18

Well that was too easy (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/16 10:09:18

I wouldn't high-five besting GA. He has no idea it even - 90Tiger MU - 1/16 10:12:13

You make inaccurate assumptions.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/16 09:42:20

I often do, since people don't, or won't, explain themselves - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:47:23

lol GAT (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/16 09:48:37

The humor escapes me.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:50:50

Right. That’s part of your absolute cluelessness - pickle MU

- 1/16 10:13:33

RE: The humor escapes me.(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/16 10:12:35

I'm liberal and I agree with that. - StaleyTiger MU - 1/16 09:37:03

"massive withdrawal" or 2000 whole troops? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/16 09:45:26

Speaking of bernie, it wouldn't surprise me if - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:39:35

We certainly know the answer to that. One could - GA Tiger MU - 1/16 09:35:45

Because it is Trump. Now the claim is he is aiding Russia. - TigerMatt STL - 1/16 09:34:33