Welcome Guest

Oh okay. Well, your last post implied that you had read

Posted on: January 15, 2019 at 10:54:06 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44902

Member For:

13.48 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

the order and noticed that no legal reason was provided in the order. I would've been surprised that you had already read the 270 page order.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Just got a good win - judge orders Trump to remove - raskolnikov MU - 1/15 10:20:44

"A federal judge in New York" Nuff said. - Coors4bob MU - 1/15 12:31:51

Stupid! The SCOTUS was already poised to address - Spanky KU - 1/15 12:03:24

Decentralize power. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/15 10:39:59

this is probably true - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/15 10:38:20

Illegals should not count or get representation - Coors4bob MU - 1/15 12:33:14

And that'll be overturned soon - Calca STL - 1/15 10:35:26

Unlikely(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/15 10:37:58

You making another prediction? - Calca STL - 1/15 10:44:45

Actually just short of excellent. (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/15 11:06:32

No legal reason provided for eliminating the question - Spanky KU - 1/15 10:41:28

getting the count right is a constitutions directive - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/15 10:52:53

Have you read the 270 page order? (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/15 10:46:49

No law precludes the question from being asked - Spanky KU - 1/15 10:52:25

Oh okay. Well, your last post implied that you had read - ummmm MU - 1/15 10:54:06

do you disagree with the judges conclusion that it will - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/15 10:53:48

Nope it will ensure the accuracy of the count - Spanky KU - 1/15 11:03:17

sorry, the consitution doesn't say it's based on citizens - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/15 11:17:22

Alabama is suing, claiming “persons” does not include - Spanky KU - 1/15 11:21:38

Seems like that should be a losing argument - ummmm MU - 1/15 11:35:15

Who knows.. since ACA never mentioned 'tax' - Spanky KU - 1/15 12:04:09

That's a great example about how the courts don't GAF - ummmm MU - 1/15 12:10:35

Agreed.... - Spanky KU - 1/15 12:18:54

Apportionment of representatives doesn't differentiate - ummmm MU - 1/15 11:08:58

It also sets the number of Electoral College votes for - Spanky KU - 1/15 11:18:52

I hope they win, but till then....(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/15 11:24:29

Judge said it was constitutional. Not a good win. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/15 10:35:13

Why do you think this is a good win, beyond - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 1/15 10:34:56

Figure it out(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/15 10:38:45

Doesn’t seem to answer the question - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 1/15 10:40:32

Jesus Christ man, citizenship question on a Census will - raskolnikov MU - 1/15 11:08:02

So your concern is participation rates. Are there other - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 1/15 11:31:14

you don't even know. you're just a partisan idiot (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/15 10:39:50

You don't want t to know. Why is that? Nm - hokie VT - 1/15 10:33:14

Will be overturned as soon as it hits the appeals court - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/15 10:31:09

RE: Just got a good win - judge orders Trump to remove - MOCO SON MU - 1/15 10:27:23

RE: Just got a good win - judge orders Trump to remove - MOCO SON MU - 1/15 10:33:26

The activist Obama judge will get slapped around - Spanky KU - 1/15 10:23:18

I assumed he's an Obama judge. Nm - hokie VT - 1/15 10:35:14

Any questions could violate illegals rights - mu7176grad MU - 1/15 10:23:12