Welcome Guest

Correct, yet you keep repeating that there was evidence when

Posted on: January 14, 2019 at 09:48:36 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

146383

Member For:

21.01 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

there was none.... why? The article in the OP was clear and described what the NYT stated...that there was no evidence.... why do you persist in wrongly stating there was?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Mollie Hemmingway hits it out of the park again! - None**** MU - 1/14 08:45:13

Mollie Hemmingway is a great annalist - Coors4bob MU - 1/14 10:17:39

That article was a POS opinion piece(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 11:41:08

What bullsht - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:05:42

RE: What bullsht - MOCO SON MU - 1/14 10:17:39

I can spot a poorly written hack a mile off - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 12:01:12

lmao(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 1/14 10:10:18

All evidence to the contrary.... - Spanky KU - 1/14 09:28:40

Ras don't care about evidence, the collusion narrative feels - MUTGR MU - 1/14 10:00:15

Posted it 4-5 times now - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 11:41:44

No, repeating it over and over doesn't make it true(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:38:21

LOL...oh that's rich coming from you! (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/14 10:00:08

Correct, yet you keep repeating that there was evidence when - Spanky KU - 1/14 09:48:36

The article in the OP was a Hack job - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:53:29

Because it used the words directly from the NYT article? - Spanky KU - 1/14 10:04:50

If you can't recognize a hack job from a hack site - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 10:19:01

as usual, because it's what Ras desperately wants to be true - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/14 09:52:38

They did, no matter how hard you choose to deny the truth. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/14 09:16:43

Really, you think Obama controlled the FBI from a distance - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:23:23

You do know those at top of FBI, Obama flunkies? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/14 09:51:46

They were butt hurt b/c Trump fired Comey (nm) - Sal KC - 1/14 09:13:55

Ha ha ha. Right, "butthurt, b/c the boss got canned - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:26:24

The NYT's article stated as much (nm) - Sal KC - 1/14 09:27:13

PROVE IT - where in the article does it say that - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:31:07

read it (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/14 09:33:56

The entire article was about the FBI opening - Sal KC - 1/14 09:31:51

Prove your claim. - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:39:41

Read the article rask (nm) - Sal KC - 1/14 09:40:36

Reread article in the OP, it is mostly a POS opinion piece(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 10:02:42

LOL (nm) - Sal KC - 1/14 10:03:18

If you can't prove it, you can't prove it. Check - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:47:51

proof in this thread that you believe only what confirms - 90Tiger MU - 1/14 09:59:36

Proof is that I stick to my guns(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 11:40:34

...regardless of facts (nm) - Sal KC - 1/14 12:21:49

LOL, Fool! - None**** MU - 1/14 09:08:59

Nothing but the epitome of deep state retaliation against - 90Tiger MU - 1/14 08:57:28

RE: Nothing but the epitome of deep state retaliation against - None**** MU - 1/14 09:22:54

yup (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/14 09:38:09

Is it hard to sleep with such dark fantasies dancing in your - raskolnikov MU - 1/14 09:29:28

fantasy? it's right in front of you (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/14 09:38:33

I wonder if the NYT's understood what they - Sal KC - 1/14 08:47:14

Aren't you the guy that said the government invests SS - tigerdb MU - 1/14 09:21:45

It largely depends on the status of the funds - Sal KC - 1/14 09:38:17

LOL - no. Sadly, there is not a SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST - tigerdb MU - 1/14 09:41:09

surpluses are typically put into treasury securities - Sal KC - 1/14 09:47:16

RE: I wonder if the NYT's understood what they - None**** MU - 1/14 08:52:38

That's what I'm referring to - Sal KC - 1/14 08:53:22