Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Fire damage is insured

Posted on: January 4, 2019 at 10:58:13 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146416
Member For:
21.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Arson damage is insured.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If I walk onto your land - tman MU - 1/4 10:44:58
     You can't prove that was me(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/4 11:21:14
          Now that was funny(nm) - tman MU - 1/4 11:26:06
     The property owner, of course (nm) - pickle MU - 1/4 11:15:40
     the property owner, you idiot (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:07:35
     God damn you are ignorant. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/4 11:06:34
          Can't have a discussion. Scream at the sky(nm) - tman MU - 1/4 11:07:32
               your analogy would be apt if you asked "who is the victim - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:10:32
                    Neither side has to carry. It is all voluntary - tman MU - 1/4 11:13:26
                         You really struggle with the most basic of concepts (nm) - pickle MU - 1/4 11:32:18
                         you're functionally retarded (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:23:26
                         person A destroyed person B's property in your example. - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:23:00
                         lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:14:16
               The victim is the property owner. - MrBlueSky MU - 1/4 11:09:03
                    No there isn't in a pickles case. The driver of that car - tman MU - 1/4 11:11:02
                         And in pickle's example there is no property destruction - MrBlueSky MU - 1/4 11:16:57
               you're literally too stupid to discuss this with, apparently - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:08:39
                    There is no victim in either case(nm) - tman MU - 1/4 11:09:55
                         RE: There is no victim in either case(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:10:55
     This isn’t the same as Pickle’s example - mizzouSECedes STL - 1/4 11:04:02
     and step into a hole and break my ankle and sue you for - Tigrrrr! MU - 1/4 11:03:46
     The property owner. - ummmm MU - 1/4 11:01:37
          How is he a victim. He wasn't physical harmed and - tman MU - 1/4 11:08:59
               You're confusing being the victim of an act with how it - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:12:32
               Because his property was destroyed. - ummmm MU - 1/4 11:11:53
                    I can't believe there is any bit of confusion about this (nm) - pickle MU - 1/4 11:19:09
     I am - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/4 10:58:25
     Me because you committed an intentional act that resulted - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 10:53:12
          Wrong. There is no victim of my actions(nm) - tman MU - 1/4 10:57:00
               You've infringed upon someone's property rights - pickle MU - 1/4 11:26:52
               RE: Wrong. There is no victim of my actions(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/4 11:09:13
               Yes there is. You're ignorant - MrBlueSky MU - 1/4 11:07:06
               Then you have a weird definition of victim* - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 10:59:34
          Your insurance will cover it. - Spanky KU - 1/4 10:55:37
               That's irrelevant as to whether I am a victim - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:00:23
                    your property was the victim.. you are fine - Spanky KU - 1/4 11:07:34
                         lol well not under the law - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:08:57
                              if anyone will be the victim, it is the insurance company - Spanky KU - 1/4 11:14:55
                                   lol no. If you destroy my property, I am the victim - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:16:14
                                        lighten up, Francis - Spanky KU - 1/4 11:20:15
               Doubtful. - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/4 10:56:59
                    Fire damage is insured - Spanky KU - 1/4 10:58:13
                         I think the insurance company would balk at arson. - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/4 11:01:41
                              I don't think the property owner knew it was coming in the - ummmm MU - 1/4 11:03:09
                                   Yeah, I introduced something that wasn't stated. - DC Jayhawk KU - 1/4 11:05:34
                                        I don't think the onus is on the homeowner to prove - Spanky KU - 1/4 11:06:50
                    No different than the car example below - tman MU - 1/4 10:58:04
                         No you are still a victim, regardless how you remedy the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/4 11:01:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard