Welcome Guest

those aren't mutually exclusive

Posted on: November 15, 2018 at 13:47:23 CT

FootballRefugee MU

Posts:

91540

Member For:

22.51 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

and if the second one meets the legal standard, there's no problem.

We'll add logic and law (two things) to that long list of things you've shown you aren't good at here.

Cool

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Removing a belligerent reporter is not a First Amendment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/15 13:30:55

LOOK !! - raskolnikov MU - 11/15 14:36:39

RE: LOOK !! - MOCO SON MU - 11/15 15:17:50

RE: Removing a belligerent reporter is not a First Amendment - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:37:31

Agreed, then why the need for a false story to remove - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:37:22

cool you have definitive proof - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:44:08

Acosta was a chronic offender... - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:40:20

then why the need for a false story? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 11/15 13:43:58

Why do you feel compelled to defend this a**hole?(nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:51:18

RE: Why do you feel compelled to defend this a**hole?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:52:44

what's false? - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:44:27

The WH said his credentials were removed because - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:46:20

Both. But either alone is enough(nm) - tman MU - 11/15 13:52:04

those aren't mutually exclusive - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:47:23

Clearly the line of "he put his hands on" the intern - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:15:14

no, they just have a better argument (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 14:19:22

Grandstanding is a better argument - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:21:38

In this case, of course. It's a "1st amendment" case - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 14:59:32

He's not bright (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 13:57:48

Lol, you're an idiot - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:30:13

RE: what's false? - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 11/15 13:45:22

Your defense of this a**hole speaks volumes about you (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:50:14

Donno that many people are defending Acosta's actions - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:34:32

that something isn't being argued - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:46:23

no reporter should question the surpreme commander - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:43:41

Acosta was infringing on the other reporters 1st Amendment - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:36:40

I thought he assaulted the - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:38:07

The Deputy AG representing the Trump admin in the - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:39:18

not really an argument that is needed - Sal KC - 11/15 13:43:26

So Sarah just lied again... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:51:51

No (nm) - Sal KC - 11/15 13:57:52

Nope. Just not needed for the case(nm) - tman MU - 11/15 13:53:38

Just lied and - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:55:56

If it was doctored there would be more on it. - tman MU - 11/15 14:16:43

WUT??? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:40:04

Trump didn't have to call on him. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:37:36

Trump wanted the conflict and when Acosta pushed back - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:41:24

Acosta is not a victim - Sal KC - 11/15 13:50:19

Neither was anyone else, Sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:56:45

Cool, I didn't say anybody else was (nm) - Sal KC - 11/15 13:58:12

So why is Trump playing the victim, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 14:02:46

I have no idea - Sal KC - 11/15 14:03:57

Or go back to him after his initial comment... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:39:01