JG has accused him of lying. Therefore BK is a liar. So JG

Posted on: October 7, 2018 at 14:28:26 CT

can argue that since BK is a liar, JG can say that any statement with which he disagrees is a lie.

That for JG is proof.

Hmmmm, recall that JG admitted that he has lied. Not on this board of course, but he has lied at other times in his life.

Therefore, using JG's own logic, JG is a liar.

A liar is not to be trusted.

So when JG said he has never lied on this board, he lied.
Unless he wasn't telling the truth when he admitted to lying elsewhere, which would make him a liar.

I think we are back to where we were a few month ago. If JG says you're a liar, you are. Disagreeing with JG is proof that you are a liar.

You're a liar because he said so. He decides what is evidence. He decides what is proof.

But then, he is a confessed liar.

Don't know about you, but i wouldn't vote to confirm him to weekend french fry chef at mcdonalds.

Edited by hokie at 14:29:02 on 10/07/18