Welcome Guest

The threat of a partisan court

Posted on: September 28, 2018 at 11:00:50 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
This may be interesting to some of you,

First paragraphs:
Three times over the past three decades, a Supreme Court nomination has touched off a battle so brutal as to become a national byword: Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, now Brett Kavanaugh.

The past two times, the high court has survived as a trusted institution. Public confidence in almost all American institutions has declined in recent decades, but confidence in the high court has not suffered the plummeting fortunes of Congress or the deep polarization which has affected Presidents George W. Bush, Obama and Trump.

Edited by raskolnikov at 11:11:35 on 09/28/18
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The threat of a partisan court - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 11:00:50
     You have no conscience. What a horrible way to live(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 9/28 11:38:20
     Trump should try to add members to the court - El-ahrairah BAMA - 9/28 11:28:36
     RE: The threat of a partisan court - MOCO SON MU - 9/28 11:21:36
     Yes, why do liberals with no moral compass such as you - Floyd Turbo 99 - 9/28 11:10:39
          While in Journalism grad school, had assignment to draw from - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 11:19:42
               Journalism school. This explains a lot about you - Calca STL - 9/28 11:21:42
     more dishonesty from the board POS - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 9/28 11:04:30
          Link to a LA Times Story suddenly = dishonesty? - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 11:10:18
               RE: Link to a LA Times Story suddenly = dishonesty? - jmlppx MU - 9/28 11:17:22
                    All good. - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 11:22:52
                         so all the hysterical women screaming that their voices - 90Tiger MU - 9/28 11:28:12
               Dishonesty is you pretending you want a non - TigerMatt STL - 9/28 11:16:21
     Oh, you mean the SC should never - GA Tiger MU - 9/28 11:04:12
     Lol. SCOTUS is a third legislative body. - ummmm MU - 9/28 11:03:41
          This (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 9/28 11:15:46
          You may be interested in this - cnk ATL - 9/28 11:11:19
               RE: You may be interested in this - Sal KC - 9/28 11:23:02
               I'm interested. - ummmm MU - 9/28 11:13:35
                    That's just the kind of attitude we're looking for!!(nm) - cnk ATL - 9/28 11:18:52
                    That response - DC Jayhawk KU - 9/28 11:14:47
                         Nooooooo - ummmm MU - 9/28 11:25:46
                              I think you're the new prez of this club (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/28 11:31:38
                                   It's not a club, man - cnk ATL - 9/28 11:53:48
          ^^^Yes^^^(nm) - LimerNick MU - 9/28 11:06:51
          agreed (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/28 11:04:15
          same (nm) - Sal KC - 9/28 11:04:14
     Why aren't Dems escorting Ford to Montgomery County to - 90Tiger MU - 9/28 11:03:27
     You're just fine with a partisan liberal court. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/28 11:03:15
     I can't even.....(nm) - dangertim MU - 9/28 11:03:00
     I think you just linked to your personal gmail inbox(nm) - LimerNick MU - 9/28 11:02:25
          what I get for being an Eisenhower baby(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 11:12:14
          lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/28 11:03:58
          opps - John podesta(nm) - dangertim MU - 9/28 11:03:53




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard