Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So, you seek a new standard for nominees?

Posted on: September 22, 2018 at 18:48:12 CT
RHAYWORTH MU
Posts:
46764
Member For:
16.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
then go to congress and trying making it a rule of law, not a progressive bullshyte wish of the freaking day.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/22 17:20:02
     They are asking for more witnesses - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:23:17
          There is only one witness & she’s a liar(nm) - MU98 STL - 9/22 20:55:44
     only an objective FBI investigation - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:13:58
          What is an "objective" FBI investigation? nm. - MUTGR MU - 9/22 20:09:38
               Most all of them - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 20:46:17
          Lol, like when they investigated Hillary - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:08:06
               why didn't Trey Gowdy's 2.5 year investigation - Gadfly MU - 9/22 19:17:51
                    Why were emails deleted, computers wiped with - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:22:06
                         that isn't possible - Gadfly MU - 9/22 19:29:14
                              What’s not possible? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:31:44
          You've at least 3 different people explain why they won't. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:19:37
               the White House needs to ask for it - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:30:00
                    That's utter bullshyte. Innocent until proven guilty. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:39:51
                         THAT only applies in a court of law bud(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:42:32
                              Idiot, Due Process still applies. Have someone educated - MU98 STL - 9/22 20:57:26
                              So, you seek a new standard for nominees? - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:48:12
                                   Not at all - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:00:58
                                        Hmm, that's why grassley's doing yet ford won't show. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 19:19:34
                         nobody is prosecuting him for a crime - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:41:57
               What is not legally possible ?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:24:14
                    Go read the posts below, I'm not wasting more time on it. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:30:22
                         Just say it - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:37:51
                              FBI doesn't have any jurisdiction on this matter. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:43:30
                                   Dipweed, they do background inquiries ALL the time - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:17:58
                                        I've actually held top secret clearance, have you? - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 19:23:45
                                             You realize how stupid what you are saying is? - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:30:15
                                                  I have a hard time lowering myself to your level. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 21:34:06
                         The more Gadfly asks - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/22 18:31:46
                              the posts here defending kavanaugh are the most emotional - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:34:24
                         it is legally possible - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:31:33
          Its not even something the FBI SHOULD - JG A - 9/22 18:17:20
               They do it all the time(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:24:55
                    If so, please provide a few examples. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:30:57
                         Anita Hill BANG - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:36:21
                              That's actually proved my point, you two idiots. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:50:02
                                   It was a character inquiry not a legal one - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:06:55
                                        Wrong again, like you are about everything you post. FBI - MU98 STL - 9/22 21:00:53
                              exactly - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:42:23
               why not? - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:17:50
                    It happened 36 years ago - JG A - 9/22 18:20:12
                         but the FBI does background checks - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:21:44
                              Since she is going to testify - JG A - 9/22 18:25:18
                                   it would establish the facts prior to testimony - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:31:00
                    The accusation is not a federal crime.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/22 18:18:36
                         the FBI does background checks - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:32:43
          RE: only an objective FBI investigation - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:15:27
     yet again - JG A - 9/22 17:42:36
          Forming a belief on evidence (or lack thereof) is bad? - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:09:08
               Not what I said, of course - JG A - 9/22 19:11:18
                    Like when you said Kavanaugh wasn’t being accused of - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 20:22:22
          lol - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:18:57
          Yes, she knows 100% what happened. Just not the year. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:11:18
          RE: yet again - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:02:36
               I haven't seen anyone say he - JG A - 9/22 18:10:46
                    RE: I haven't seen anyone say he - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:22:36
                         I would ask if you are that stupid - JG A - 9/22 18:30:28
                              nobody can ever know, jg, speculating one way or the - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:34:33
                    calling her a victim does that (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:21:05
                         Link it up - JG A - 9/22 18:21:35
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:27:00
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:25:32
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:24:25
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:23:44
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:23:07
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:22:49
                                   All of those are more about making accurate points - JG A - 9/22 18:28:18
                                        RE: All of those are more about making accurate points - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 19:48:50
                                             You partisan hacks really are droll - JG A - 9/22 19:56:51
                                        Lol, you’d be better served tucking your tail and going away - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:12:08
                                             Yeah school for the mentally handicapped - JG A - 9/22 19:14:17
                                                  Lol. Ok, Xenu. 👽👽👽 (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:17:53
                                                  yes, and drop you off (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:17:01
                                        yes, every time they call her a victim and treat BK as - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:30:10
                                             Its a manner of speech - JG A - 9/22 18:32:10
                                                  take this back, liar - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:37:43
                                                       well OK Spanky lied about a fake person - JG A - 9/22 18:38:51
                                                  no, JG, it's a rhetorical device used to imply his guilt and - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:37:01
                                                       You have no understanding of what the word - JG A - 9/22 18:39:39
                                                            There's no case, no arrest, no charge, hence, no evidence. - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:16:33
                                                                 If it was a criminal charge - JG A - 9/22 19:22:05
                                                                      there is no "evidence" here of anything. nothing. zero. Non - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:46:12
                                                                           LOl I spelled it out for you and still - JG A - 9/22 19:47:51
          How is Kavanaugh supposed to ‘prove’ he didn’t attend a - Spanky KU - 9/22 17:47:44
               RE: How is Kavanaugh supposed to ‘prove’ he didn’t attend a - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:05:21
                    ROFLMFAO - "progressive liberal globalist . . . "(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:26:48
                    He's not on trial for a crime - JG A - 9/22 18:09:52
               No one is accusing me of it - JG A - 9/22 17:48:49
                    Only because animals can't talk. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:13:02
                    One of my coworkers said she was in Vegas sometime in - Spanky KU - 9/22 18:11:00
                         well as usual you are lying - JG A - 9/22 18:14:45
                              Prove it - Spanky KU - 9/22 18:20:25
                                   Present your alleged coworker - JG A - 9/22 18:21:12
                                        present your defense first - Spanky KU - 9/22 20:01:48
                                             I didn't do it I wasn't there - JG A - 9/22 22:04:09
                                                  Prove you weren’t at the unnamed place at the unnamed time - Spanky KU - 9/22 22:11:15
                                                       If you weren't lying - JG A - 9/22 22:47:44
                              RE: well as usual you are lying - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:16:31
                                   Yeah how utterly unusual that a liar lied - JG A - 9/22 18:17:53
                    Damn, you're stupid. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:53:49
                         a false one - JG A - 9/22 17:54:53
                              It was a perfect analogy. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:02:23
                                   Perfectly false - JG A - 9/22 18:09:05
          If there is no proof either way, then what is the reason - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:44:46
               And there is the principle of innocence until guilt is - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:48:43
                    I'm not assuming, unlike you I'm looking at - JG A - 9/22 17:52:59
                         You aren't looking at any evidence. You're just fantasizing - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:56:47
                              LOL such Wycoiny - JG A - 9/22 17:58:16
                         The only thing offered which meets the criteria for what is - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:56:29
                              Yeah and? - JG A - 9/22 17:59:19
                                   And you have offered nothing as evidence of guilt. - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 18:01:51
                                        I'm sorry you don't understand how reality works - JG A - 9/22 18:13:24
                                             One thing is certainly true. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:40:18
                                                  LOL - JG A - 9/22 19:12:26
                                                       Actually, that's you. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 22:10:38
               The preponderance of the evidence - JG A - 9/22 17:48:09
                    False. There cannot be a preponderance of evidence he is - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:52:32
                         yes there can - JG A - 9/22 17:54:30
                              RE: yes there can - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:26:17
                                   RE: yes there can - JG A - 9/22 18:36:08
                              You think he is lying is not proof. We don't determine the - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:58:45
                                   The evidence is thus - JG A - 9/22 18:06:40
                                        cool word dude nm - redngray MU - 9/23 19:46:31
                                        so, in your evidence you show that you're biased against him - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:14:37
                                             how so? - JG A - 9/22 18:15:30
                                                  that's even dumber than your last claim. congrats. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:17:44
                                                       My only bias is that he is unfit to sit on the Supreme Cour - JG A - 9/22 18:23:27
                    There is no "preponderance of the evidence." - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:51:21
     RE: Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 17:36:55
     RE: Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 17:35:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard