Comment 1. You didn't refute my first point, you merely objected to it. For evidence of my first point, look at the content of the first paragraph of this 2016 NYT article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html
You want to refute my point, then offer some opposing evidence.
Comment 2. You are a little behind the times with your continuing belief in Trump collusion with the Russians. Some of the media were in corrupt cahoots with the FBI-DOJ cabal all along, but others took the cabal's hook, and lately they've come to the realization (but not public acknowledgement) they were suckers. Haven't you noticed the shift in coverage? Much less of the Russia, Russia, Russia push, with greater emphasis currently on "there might not have been any collusion, but it's a "conspiracy theory" to think it was a set up...the Mueller probe is just good guys trying to do their job."
Edited by kp83 at 22:26:12 on 09/13/18