Welcome Guest

RE: Personal attack because you can’t rationally address that

Posted on: September 8, 2018 at 09:49:08 CT

None**** MU

Posts:

4919

Member For:

7.21 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Address what? You didn't understand the analysis within the article you cited in your first post. When challenged, you didn't defend your erroneous statement and went on to sidetrack the thread with irrelevance.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

This Op-Ed begins with a false premise & is therefore trash - Doc James USA - 9/8 08:37:26

RE: This Op-Ed begins with a false premise & is therefore trash - MOCO SON MU - 9/8 10:24:22

RE: This Op-Ed begins with a false premise & is therefore trash - None**** MU - 9/8 08:54:35

It is a political hack piece - Doc James USA - 9/8 09:05:40

You obviously didn't even read the piece (nm) - Sal KC - 9/8 09:08:54

I read it - Doc James USA - 9/8 09:15:29

it's clear you didn't (nm) - Sal KC - 9/8 09:17:16

RE: It is a political hack piece - None**** MU - 9/8 09:08:26

Personal attack because you can’t rationally address that - Doc James USA - 9/8 09:16:45

RE: Personal attack because you can’t rationally address that - None**** MU - 9/8 09:49:08

RE: Personal attack because you can’t rationally address that - Doc James USA - 9/8 10:17:45

lol he is so dumb (nm) - Sal KC - 9/8 08:56:35

Here is Rosenstein's letter - Sal KC - 9/8 08:43:10

So?(nm) - Doc James USA - 9/8 08:53:07

so you apparently don't get the point (nm) - Sal KC - 9/8 08:56:12

You don’t understand the Op-Ed isn’t grounded in fact - Doc James USA - 9/8 09:02:43

I see you can't back up your assertion from the OP - Sal KC - 9/8 09:03:27

; judges legitimized his appointment - Doc James USA - 9/8 09:49:36

again, you're missing the point (nm) - Sal KC - 9/8 09:53:43

RE: This Op-Ed begins with a false premise & is therefore trash - RNcaud MU - 9/8 08:41:42