Welcome Guest

no, if you are ok with the consequence of

Posted on: July 4, 2018 at 12:15:57 CT

Ferg MU

Posts:

18364

Member For:

26.21 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

one of the other candidates winning. I've voted for candidates that had no chance when the two legitimate candidates were unacceptable. The last presidential election is one example.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

love the constitutional "debate" below about SCOTUS - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 10:14:13

You need to run far away from this 90 - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/4 10:36:21

from what, exactly, am I to run, Rags? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:10:35

Those that encourage "non-participation" - Ferg STL - 7/4 10:43:31

not voting is participating by sending a different message - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:17:39

I see. So, as someone who would prefer the US gvmt - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:11:50

not voting is the equivalent of picking up your toys - Ferg STL - 7/4 11:23:46

is voting for an independent or libertarian with no chance - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:42:38

no, if you are ok with the consequence of - Ferg STL - 7/4 12:15:57

No, Ferg. It isn't. If 95% of the country didn't vote, you - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:41:56

Why would 95% of the country not vote? Why not - Ferg STL - 7/4 12:13:44

90 has hope he isn’t a zealot like pickle and umm - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/4 10:49:41

Neither Ummmm nor I are anarchists. And to what is - 90Tiger MU - 7/4 11:13:14