RE: That was explained in NEWS articles
Posted on: July 3, 2018 at 12:01:07 CT
KenMan33 MU
Posts:
2771
Member For:
19.12 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The author is a former associate at Latham & Watkins so not some smuck from The National Enquirer.
" Even if Davidson improperly disclosed information to Avenatti (he denies doing so), such a disclosure wouldn’t be legal grounds for voiding the agreement between Broidy and Bechard. Broidy’s remedy in this situation would be to sue Davidson for damages, not to unilaterally cancel his agreement with Bechard. After all, there’s no allegation that Bechard violated the agreement, and, at the time Davidson allegedly did so, he wasn’t even Bechard’s lawyer anymore."