Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Having laws on the books-used or not doesn’t increase

Posted on: April 27, 2018 at 18:17:46 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.22 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
or decrease government, but I think any attempt by Congress to identify laws not being used and debating whether they should be repealed or not would result in a total waste of dollars. And thinking that Congress would even read the specifics of what they were trying to repeal is a stretch imo
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So the Logan Act is the problem? - Silas MU - 4/27 16:52:19
     RE: So the Logan Act is the problem? - Spanky KU - 4/27 16:59:21
          Then why the concern over repealing it? - Mo Texan MU - 4/27 17:54:19
               Do you think Dennis Rodman and John Kerry - Sal KC - 4/27 19:08:30
               Federal criminal code is a bloated mess and needs to - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:00:38
                    Why this specific act-now?* - Mo Texan MU - 4/27 18:07:57
                         The Logan Act? Because the democrats - Sal KC - 4/27 19:13:29
                         I don't know what specific act you are referring to. But - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:26:53
               it is dead. No need for the law. It is akin to - Spanky KU - 4/27 17:58:18
                    That doesn’t answer my question as to how it hurts - Mo Texan MU - 4/27 18:06:46
                         Because there is no need for the law - Spanky KU - 4/27 18:19:38
                         Why not take the opportunity to reduce govt? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/27 18:11:51
                              Having laws on the books-used or not doesn’t increase - Mo Texan MU - 4/27 18:17:46
                                   Sure it does. It removes unnecessary laws that can be - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:26:06
          The Constitution is older - Silas MU - 4/27 17:07:35
               It isn't a question of age...you clearly didn't read my post - Spanky KU - 4/27 17:32:10
               You tards want to abolish the 2nd amendment.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 17:13:53
                    Or properly construe it - Silas MU - 4/27 17:15:32
                         You have been proven wrong time and again on this - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 17:24:52
                              Felons get guns - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 17:26:08
                                   And prisoners also! - Spanky KU - 4/27 17:33:06
                                        Those who run prisons, like anyone else have a right to - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 17:34:11
                                             Who's property is a prison? - Spanky KU - 4/27 18:21:00
                                                  Depends(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:24:36
                                                       Let’s pick a specific prison, ok? - Spanky KU - 4/27 18:41:43
                                                            Technically the taxpayer. I can kinda think of them as share - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:48:14
                                                                 Technically, taxpayers write the laws also...agreed? - Spanky KU - 4/27 18:56:19
                                                                      No. Like shareholders they have limited voting rights. But - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 19:29:03
                                                                           So taxpayers don’t own the prison either - Spanky KU - 4/27 21:31:35
                                                       American taxpayer paying for it - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 18:28:28
                                                            Yes.. tax payers are paying for it. Some are private - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:30:21
                                   You scared of Martha Stewart carrying a .380?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 17:27:34
                                        So felons should have guns? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 17:28:38
                                             Their right should not be infringed(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 17:30:02
                                                  sweet. Prisoners too - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 18:27:48
                                                       It is simple, but over your head. A prisoner is not on - TigerMatt STL - 4/27 18:35:05
                                                            we are the property owner. It's our prison. USA USA USA - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 18:45:43
     That just says - JayHoaxH8r MU - 4/27 16:58:18
     it's pointless and obviously ignored (nm) - Sal KC - 4/27 16:54:28




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard