Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

So do you think he was unbiased and fair?

Posted on: January 31, 2018 at 15:54:18 CT

615Tiger STL

Posts:

19299

Member For:

14.41 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

Are you trying to say this is somehow evidence that Strozk was actually unbiased in his actions during the Clinton/Trump investigations?

Have they found any text messages from him yet in which he is critical of HRC yet? Or is his unprofessional criticism limited only to Donald Trump.

Remind me - once they "re-opened" the HRC matter, did they subsequently find any criminal wrongdoing on her part? If not, do you think that was because there actually was no criminal wrongdoing?

Edited by 615Tiger at 15:57:47 on 01/31/18

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Peter Strozk was heavily involved in re-opening the HRC - playhard NWMSU - 1/31 15:42:51

This is not news - Sal KC - 1/31 17:06:59

backfire is a b*tch (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 1/31 16:09:40

It's going to be interesting to watch as leaks like this - StaleyTiger MU - 1/31 16:04:40

I don't think the Nunes memo has anything - Sal KC - 1/31 17:07:56

RE: It's going to be interesting to watch as leaks like this - MOCO SON MU - 1/31 16:50:21

lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/31 16:07:25

So he could put the fix in...again (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 1/31 15:59:21

yeah.. he sure was on her side! - ivan drago MU - 1/31 15:55:27

the FBI isn't against trump. try to at least get your false - 90Tiger MU - 1/31 15:58:25

So do you think he was unbiased and fair? - 615Tiger STL - 1/31 15:54:18

RE: So do you think he was unbiased and fair? - Badird MU - 1/31 15:57:39

What I am suggesting is - 615Tiger STL - 1/31 16:03:06

Then why would he want to... - Badird MU - 1/31 16:08:52

What evidence do you have - 615Tiger STL - 1/31 16:15:40

I have this link. - Badird MU - 1/31 16:19:03

Yep.. he sat on the information for 3 weeks - Spanky KU - 1/31 15:52:25

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard