Welcome Guest

The difference was 3-point shooting, not coaching. Anyone

Posted on: December 23, 2017 at 21:52:33 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
72138
Member For:
11.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
who claims otherwise didn't watch the game or check the 3-point stat line:

Illinois: 6-14 (42.9%) (above their average)
Missouri: 5-27 (18.5%) (WAY below our average)

We also had 7 points waved off due to questionable offensive foul calls.

And yet we only lost by 6.

If luck and officiating had been even, we would have won by 10+.

Cuonzo is not the reason we lost tonight.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The difference was 3-point shooting, not coaching. Anyone - zounami MU - 12/23 21:52:33
     When 3-point shooting sucks, the job of the coach is to - Tiger_1995 MU - 12/23 22:04:06
          What? Tigers have only one big: Tilmon nm - BlackSheep MU - 12/23 22:30:57
     you sound like the Iraqi communications officer.... - TigerAlum91 MU - 12/23 22:00:16
     did geist play the second half? - gmmm98 MU - 12/23 21:58:53
     Lol you idiot - Calca STL - 12/23 21:55:52
          We have excellent 3-point shooters who normally convert - zounami MU - 12/23 22:02:17
               ^^^^Normally convert against mid-majors****** - Big_Tigga MU - 12/23 22:11:56
               No - Calca STL - 12/23 22:05:06
                    In this day and age of the 3-pt shot - BlackSheep MU - 12/23 22:32:52
     JESUS!!! A poster with the ability to THINK!!! BRAVO SIR!! - Diamonm MU - 12/23 21:55:51
          Wrong - Calca STL - 12/23 21:57:27
               No, he's 100% correct. (nm) - zounami MU - 12/23 22:02:35




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard