Welcome Guest

Yeah, that would make sense in a 30 years bubble.

Posted on: December 12, 2017 at 17:29:28 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Wouldn't it?


Now, in regards to this specific article and the numbers he sets forth, do you have any thoughts? Or just attacks against the author?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Stockman has a 30 year trend of being wrong - Ferg STL - 12/12 17:18:12
          Yeah, that would make sense in a 30 years bubble. - ummmm MU - 12/12 17:29:28
               in ten years he’ll be spreading fear about a 40 year bubble. - Ferg STL - 12/12 17:38:33
                    So, just attacks against the author. - ummmm MU - 12/12 17:42:08
                         I'll safely assume that you did not read past the byline - ummmm MU - 12/12 17:42:48
                              I did comment on the piece - Ferg STL - 12/12 17:45:42
                                   This is a dressed up attack against Stockman and - ummmm MU - 12/12 17:50:06
                                        No it’s actually a rejection of the narative from - Ferg STL - 12/12 18:03:34
                                             But how about answering my ancillary question. - ummmm MU - 12/12 18:07:08
                                                  Did I say the economy was in “great” shape? - Ferg STL - 12/12 19:59:58
                                             The article is not about the "sky is falling". - ummmm MU - 12/12 18:05:45
                                                  That's exactly what it's about. He cherry picked data - Ferg STL - 12/12 20:57:03
          The Fester reference sold me.(nm) - Toger STL - 12/12 17:26:21
               That part may actually be an exaggeration - Ferg STL - 12/12 17:29:37
     RE: The 30 Years Bubble -- Why America Ain't That Rich - 90Tiger MU - 12/12 17:02:47




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard