 |
|
Ok, humor me...
Posted on: December 12, 2017 at 12:38:08 CT
Badird MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.56 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Leaving out ALL WHATABOUTS and false equivalencies, answer these to the best of your knowledge or in terms of MOST LIKELY:
1) Did Russia hack the DNC, give info to Wikileaks, invest in misinformation campaigns via social media, and attempt to de-legitimize the election process?
2) If yes, did Russia do that in clear favor of Drumpf?
3) Did Trump promote a 'resetting' of relations with Russia? Did Trump praise Putin? Did Trump ask Russia to hack HRC? Did Flynn promise to "rip up" Obama sanctions on Russia (for the meddling)?
4) Did members of Trump's staff meet with Russian officials or people that have direct connections with the higher-ups in Russian government?
5) If yes to all of the above (and the answer is yes to all), do you not see a conflict there? Isnt it worthy of a FULL investigation?
I will admit that the PROOF is not there... yet. But as I also said, the public is not privy to all of the details and may never be. What matters is that they get the bottom of this. And if you want to entertain the idea of whatabouts in relation to HRC or Obama's DOJ or illegal immigrants voting for her or the dossier (which Republicans funded and initiated), then the floor is yours. I see those as unrelated. But if there is sufficient evidence to launch this investigation, then by all means; proceed. It has been said by BOTH sides that there was sufficient evidence to launch the Russian Collusion Investigation and to nominate Mueller.
So my point ultimately is, if BOTH parties think there was enough evidence to appoint a special prosecutor and launch the investigation, you would have to try VERY hard to deny its legitimacy. Who on this board is the biggest Drumpf defender? Who on this board is the biggest Drumpf denier of wrongdoing? Well, you are, sir.
Edited by Badird at 12:38:53 on 12/12/17
1) Did Russia hack the DNC, give info to Wikileaks, invest in misinformation campaigns via social media, and attempt to de-legitimize the election process?
2) If yes, did Russia do that in clear favor of Drumpf?
3) Did Trump promote a 'resetting' of relations with Russia? Did Trump praise Putin? Did Trump ask Russia to hack HRC? Did Flynn promise to "rip up" Obama sanctions on Russia (for the meddling)?
4) Did members of Trump's staff meet with Russian officials or people that have direct connections with the higher-ups in Russian government?
5) If yes to all of the above (and the answer is yes to all), do you not see a conflict there? Isnt it worthy of a FULL investigation?
I will admit that the PROOF is not there... yet. But as I also said, the public is not privy to all of the details and may never be. What matters is that they get the bottom of this. And if you want to entertain the idea of whatabouts in relation to HRC or Obama's DOJ or illegal immigrants voting for her or the dossier (which Republicans funded and initiated), then the floor is yours. I see those as unrelated. But if there is sufficient evidence to launch this investigation, then by all means; proceed. It has been said by BOTH sides that there was sufficient evidence to launch the Russian Collusion Investigation and to nominate Mueller.
So my point ultimately is, if BOTH parties think there was enough evidence to appoint a special prosecutor and launch the investigation, you would have to try VERY hard to deny its legitimacy. Who on this board is the biggest Drumpf defender? Who on this board is the biggest Drumpf denier of wrongdoing? Well, you are, sir.
Edited by Badird at 12:38:53 on 12/12/17
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Ok, humor me... - Badird MU - 12/12 12:38:08