Welcome Guest

Ok, conservatives, I need an explanation here.

Posted on: December 5, 2017 at 08:07:56 CT
GA Tiger MU
Posts:
252525
Member For:
26.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
If this baker can prevail here, and also owns a restaurant, please tell me why he would have to serve the LBGT crowd, or that couple, using precisely the same argument. If he wouldn't have to (by law), is it good law?


Gay wedding cake case comes before Supreme Court with ramifications for discrimination

The Supreme Court is set to take up oral arguments on Tuesday in a controversial case that could set a precedent for whether businesses are allowed to turn away customers based on religious beliefs.

The case is tied to a baker in Colorado, who says he has the right under the First Amendment to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The incident in question took place in 2012, when a gay couple visited Masterpiece Cakes in Lakewood, Colorado and asked for a custom cake -- a request the owner declined.

Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakes, in court documents says he "gladly serves people from all walks of life, including individuals of all races, faiths, and sexual orientations. But he cannot design custom cakes that express ideas or celebrate events at odds with his religious beliefs."
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Ok, conservatives, I need an explanation here. - GA Tiger MU - 12/5 08:07:56
     Illegal know - meatiger MU - 12/5 09:29:12
     As an aside this is a dumb case... - Gyro MU - 12/5 09:09:17
          Dumb - pickle MU - 12/5 09:14:34
               You have no life, but expected(nm) - Gyro MU - 12/5 09:30:12
     he could refuse to cater an LGBT wedding reception - Spanky KU - 12/5 08:42:52
          Like I say, any definite solution can be questioned.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 12/5 08:55:04
               No (nm) - pickle MU - 12/5 09:14:48
     I have never understood this argument either. - TGR84 MU - 12/5 08:22:26
     He would appear hypocritical if he claimed - MUGuy2004 STL - 12/5 08:15:04
          I have no answer on this issue. Its about the - GA Tiger MU - 12/5 08:18:49
               It's a simple matter of property rights - pickle MU - 12/5 08:33:24
          he's making a distinction between serving and - SwampTiger MU - 12/5 08:17:42
          not really - MizzouAstro MU - 12/5 08:17:27
     There would be no law saying he wouldn't have to serve them - MizzouAstro MU - 12/5 08:12:37
     There are no conservatives here (nm) - pickle MU - 12/5 08:09:36
          Shut up (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 12/5 08:15:13
               Well stated (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/5 08:17:53
                    He's a tool and doesn't add to the "conversations" he - MUGuy2004 STL - 12/5 08:23:59
                         RE: He's a tool and doesn't add to the "conversations" he - SwampTiger MU - 12/5 08:27:43




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard