 |
|
information has NEVER been adjudicated to mean a
Posted on: November 26, 2017 at 00:28:43 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14425
Member For:
19.97 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"thing of value" under the law your attempting to use to prove your point.
if the law were to be interpreted as such it would be ruled unconstitutional the first time it faced judicial review.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/07/14/the-strikingly-broad-consequences-of-the-argument-that-donald-trump-jr-broke-the-law-by-expressing-interest-in-russian-dirt-on-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.cebc4eb1f454
Edited by blake1771 at 00:29:20 on 11/26/17
if the law were to be interpreted as such it would be ruled unconstitutional the first time it faced judicial review.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/07/14/the-strikingly-broad-consequences-of-the-argument-that-donald-trump-jr-broke-the-law-by-expressing-interest-in-russian-dirt-on-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.cebc4eb1f454
Edited by blake1771 at 00:29:20 on 11/26/17
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
information has NEVER been adjudicated to mean a - blake1771 KC - 11/26 00:28:43