Welcome Guest

RE: Uranium One - what is incorrect here?

Posted on: November 14, 2017 at 21:33:05 CT

MOCO SON MU

Posts:

29635

Member For:

8.71 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Interesting and sad defense of this crap. I continue to await your posting of the "hard data" you claim proves the scientific community's complete understanding of the energy output cycles of the Sun!

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Uranium One - what is incorrect here? - Silas MU - 11/14 17:58:15

RE: Uranium One - what is incorrect here? - MOCO SON MU - 11/14 21:33:05

20 percent of America’s licensed uranium mining capacity - Rabbit Test MU - 11/14 21:10:29

That has zero to do with the issue at hand (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 21:13:24

Yes the issue is the deflection to a non-story - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 11/15 09:54:20

NYT actually did a random act of journalism and covered this - MUTGR MU - 11/14 18:29:58

So you’re citing the Failing NYT, a known source of - Silas MU - 11/14 18:41:16

RE: So you’re citing the Failing NYT, a known source of - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/14 19:10:58

You are a genius - mu7176grad MU - 11/14 18:53:11

Here is a detailed analysis - Silas MU - 11/14 19:40:38

Interesting that you cite a source that has reservations - MIZ45 MU - 11/14 20:49:05

Isn't it interesting how things just get made up as you go - MIZ45 MU - 11/14 18:20:01

The very article he posted - Sal KC - 11/14 18:24:12

At least that thing isn't President - mu7176grad MU - 11/14 18:40:42

RE: At least that thing isn't President - GMT MU - 11/14 20:39:55

Good - MIZ45 MU - 11/14 20:46:09

LOOK IT IS A SHINY OBJECT - raskolnikov MU - 11/14 18:12:58

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA - mu7176grad MU - 11/14 18:28:59

This is one Russia storyline they don't want to follow - Sal KC - 11/14 18:29:58

If a Trump company had anything remotely similar - Sal KC - 11/14 18:19:16

The 20% number has zero to do with the initial business deal - Sal KC - 11/14 18:00:50

can you explain the initial business deal?(nm) - tigerdb MU - 11/14 18:01:36

Yes, it's the sale of U.O. to Rosatom (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 18:03:57

Ah, I thought it was the foundation receiving $100m - tigerdb MU - 11/14 18:12:42

You left out the part where multiple Rosatom shareholders - Sal KC - 11/14 18:18:44

When? - Silas MU - 11/14 18:19:51

Does that matter? - Sal KC - 11/14 18:22:52

Why wouldn’t the timing of donations matter? - Silas MU - 11/14 18:24:55

Does that make a difference in what? - Sal KC - 11/14 18:26:03

Answer the question, rather than dodge it. - Silas MU - 11/14 18:43:07

I asked you what you were referring to... - Sal KC - 11/14 18:45:51

What if it was given to you 2 years before you were a cop? - Silas MU - 11/14 19:16:17

Yes, it would still be an issue (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 20:42:34

Hillary >>>> jail (nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 11/14 18:00:14

If anything, it's an investigation that would lead to - Sal KC - 11/14 18:01:56

Tell me about the pay for play - Silas MU - 11/14 18:19:16

Explained above (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 18:19:27

RE: Explained above (nm) - Silas MU - 11/14 18:25:14