Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You clearly focus

Posted on: November 14, 2017 at 10:35:46 CT
mizzoumurfkc KC
Posts:
62951
Member For:
20.93 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
only on what you want to focus on, Sal.
My first comment...in my own words...:

Let 'em go after the hag for the Uranium One deal. I wouldn't doubt at all that the Clintons did some shady financial dealings, but Russia didn't get 20% of U.S. uranium.
Not one ounce left the U.S bound for Russia...

To highlight:

Let 'em go after the hag for the Uranium One deal. I wouldn't doubt at all that the Clintons did some shady financial dealings.........
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

2010 is way beyond any date where anyone - catbirdseat MU - 11/14 09:55:26
     They should just go where the evidence takes them. nm. - MUTGR MU - 11/14 10:12:52
          Wait--the Mueller standard applies beyond Mueller ??? - mu7176grad MU - 11/14 10:14:08
               RE: Wait--the Mueller standard applies beyond Mueller ??? - MUTGR MU - 11/14 10:16:01
                    Catbird says it shouldn't - mu7176grad MU - 11/14 10:24:05
                         7 year statute of limitations - catbirdseat MU - 11/14 10:30:02
                              RE: 7 year statute of limitations - MUTGR MU - 11/14 10:31:17
     Tell that to Manafort - Spanky KU - 11/14 10:11:49
     lol (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 09:57:52
          I'm guessing he didn't even read the article - Sal KC - 11/14 09:58:56
               RE: I'm guessing he didn't even read the article - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:12:35
                    Your're right. It went to Canada first then to Russia. - SoCalTigr UM - 11/14 10:27:26
                         RE: Your're right. It went to Canada first then to Russia. - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:36:17
                              RE: Your're right. It went to Canada first then to Russia. - Sal KC - 11/14 10:38:09
                    Neither are relevant to the issue at hand (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 10:15:18
                         RE: Neither are relevant to the issue at hand (nm) - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:16:11
                              Your 20% comment or Uranium leaving the U.S. (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 10:16:37
                                   RE: Your 20% comment or Uranium leaving the U.S. (nm) - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:20:18
                                        I don't care what Trump said - Sal KC - 11/14 10:23:53
                                             RE: I don't care what Trump said - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:25:34
                                                  Why is the 20% relevant to the U.O. deal? - Sal KC - 11/14 10:26:15
                                                       I always answer in my own words, Sal. - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:29:32
                                                            You didn't answer the question (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 10:30:06
                                                                 RE: You didn't answer the question (nm) - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:31:02
                                                                      You're focusing on non relevant issues - Sal KC - 11/14 10:32:15
                                                                           You clearly focus - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:35:46
                                                                                Then why do you keep bringing up non relevant points? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 10:36:50
                                                                                     RE: Then why do you keep bringing up non relevant points? (nm) - mizzoumurfkc MU - 11/14 10:37:20
     Oh, THAT's a witch hunt? (nm) - Sal KC - 11/14 09:56:32
          It is. - catbirdseat MU - 11/14 10:09:50




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard