Welcome Guest

More reasonable than the liberal censorship of ads, such

Posted on: November 6, 2017 at 19:01:30 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72636
Member For:
21.56 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
as the Post Dispatch that refused a pro-life ad of a picture of a broken baby doll because it was "too graphic". Really? One of those old time plastic dolls with an arm and a leg detached, which was the condition of many such dolls from a bygone era.

Many other even more innocuous pro-life ads have been refused by mainstream media all over the country on a regular basis.

Liberals were even freaking out over a Super Bowl ad that featured Tim Tebow and doing everything they could to get them to pull the ad before the game... and it was a very innocuous ad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw7qX1TpdNQ

They didn't even say a word about abortion or even "pro-life" nor mention that doctors had recommended aborting him because of physical complications.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     More reasonable than the liberal censorship of ads, such - JeffB MU - 11/6 19:01:30
     And in related Newz - RUSSIANS !! LOL - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/6 18:25:54
          I like how he's mad that Fox won't air an ad saying to - MIZ45 MU - 11/6 18:28:37
     They were ignorant ads from an ignorant man - Spanky KU - 11/6 18:22:54
     What impeachable offenses does the ad cite? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 11/6 18:17:57
          DO SOMETHING!!!!!!(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 11/6 18:28:18
               Answer my question, please. (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 11/6 18:28:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard