 |
|
You're totally mis-characterizing our exchanges
Posted on: October 11, 2017 at 12:14:55 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.33 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
You told me to read a history book from at least 40 years ago because there was information contained in those books that I was not aware of (and apparently you were).
I asked for the name of one of these books. You were unable to provide it.
It wasn't a memory test; it was a natural follow up question to you in regards to these books that definitely contained the information that you knew, and that I did not know.
Since you were unable to produce the title of one book with this information and instead vaguely and nostalgically referred to the days of better history books, then your initial directions to me to read one of those books is meaningless.
Like I asked the other day, is there a chance that these books (which you cannot remember) were simply brainwashing you?
I asked for the name of one of these books. You were unable to provide it.
It wasn't a memory test; it was a natural follow up question to you in regards to these books that definitely contained the information that you knew, and that I did not know.
Since you were unable to produce the title of one book with this information and instead vaguely and nostalgically referred to the days of better history books, then your initial directions to me to read one of those books is meaningless.
Like I asked the other day, is there a chance that these books (which you cannot remember) were simply brainwashing you?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
You're totally mis-characterizing our exchanges - ummmm MU - 10/11 12:14:55