Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No, you would pick a starting point and begin

Posted on: October 5, 2017 at 16:49:56 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56585
Member For:
18.57 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
what it would eliminate is "honest" "legitimate" gun dealers from dumping guns into questionable hands in shady deals because it could be tracked back to a certain point and they'd have to explain.

It wouldn't stop criminals. It might stop "honest" people from assisting criminals.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Nice victory for freedom in DC today in the wake of more - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:03:05
     Limiting a bump stock is not gun control - Spanky KU - 10/5 16:35:19
          It is unconstitutional - pickle MU - 10/5 17:09:50
               Learn English, learn about weapons, learn about the law and - Spanky KU - 10/5 17:53:22
          Hey dumbfvck, this wasnt about a bump stock. lol(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:37:38
               since you earlier declared Feinsteins legislation on bump - Spanky KU - 10/5 17:55:56
     RE: Nice victory for freedom in DC today in the wake of more - Role Call MU - 10/5 16:23:28
          All legal gun purchases? no, because it is impossible(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:26:55
               How about a pre-sale ballistics test - Mormad MU - 10/5 16:39:48
                    that wont work either for all guns legally sold and bought(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:40:34
                         Why not? If you had the manufacturer do the test - Mormad MU - 10/5 16:46:00
                              You would have to outlaw individual private gun sales after - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:47:38
                                   No, you would pick a starting point and begin - Mormad MU - 10/5 16:49:56
                                        millions upon millions of guns in circulation. wont work - hefeweizen MU - 10/5 16:50:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard