Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Oh, obviously, I am for less spending too.

Posted on: September 22, 2017 at 12:36:52 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.32 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
But even before you consider less spending, I think it's worth pointing out that revenue neutral tax "reform" is meaningless.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If Trump successfully passes tax reform - El-ahrairah KC - 9/22 12:29:31
     They come hand in hand. - Hbombtiger STL - 9/22 12:47:35
     Who gets the tax cut and what gets a spending reduction?(nm) - playhard KC - 9/22 12:35:34
          Tax cuts go to tax payers - El-ahrairah KC - 9/22 12:37:54
               I'd start by eliminating social security immediately. (nm) - ummmm MU - 9/22 12:39:00
     Since that would be a failure - JG A - 9/22 12:32:43
     No. Revenue neutral tax "reform" is not what is needed. - ummmm MU - 9/22 12:32:10
          yup (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 13:16:20
          But we will just go deeper into debt - El-ahrairah KC - 9/22 12:35:27
               So why did tax revenues to up after Reagan's massive... - Lerxst MU - 9/22 13:45:41
                    You answered your own question. - ummmm MU - 9/22 14:09:45
               Oh, obviously, I am for less spending too. - ummmm MU - 9/22 12:36:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard