Two questions:

Posted on: September 16, 2017 at 11:16:57 CT

1. In Charlottesville, if the klowns from the klan had been allowed to march all by themselves down the street in their cute little costumes would there have been any violence?

And morons, save your keystrokes, I am not suggesting that the left did not have every right to counter protest.

The question is simple, if the klan and their buddies had been allowed a solitary march through Charlottesville, would there have been violence?

2. Have any elected Democrats condemned the violence from the left? Or any recent presidents? Or any recent presidential candidates? Neither a crotchety old socialist or a crotchety wrinkled old hag have said anything that I am aware of against the violence from the left.

They had cows and kittens when there was equal responsibility from the left and the right, but they carefully condemned only violence from the right.

Bonus question for extra credit. In the past several months, has the left had any "demonstrations" without violence?

When they left "demonstrates," and there is no counter protest or demonstration, there is virtually always violence.

There was violence at trump's inauguration.
There was violence at Charlottesville.
There is violence at Berkeley every time a conservative wants to speak.
There was violence on a college campuss when a solidly liberal professor decided not to obey black thugs matter and evacuate the campuss when ordered to do so.

There is violence in the streets whenever a court decision goes against the edicts of black thugs matter.

Remember when we were all told how terrible and dangerous the tea party is?

Edited by hokie at 11:26:58 on 09/16/17