Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

THIS

Posted on: September 14, 2017 at 20:19:11 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
is why they require you to have a license to practice law in the State of Missouri.

If you can't prove anything from the tape, then it isn't incriminating. (This is not me saying that you can't prove anything from the tape. This is me saying the comment is stupid.)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Jason Stockley is guilty as sin - MrBlueSky MU - 9/14 13:00:39
     I didn't know you were in the jury pool - TigerFan92 MU - 9/14 14:26:36
     what makes you think that? - Spanky KU - 9/14 14:06:40
          Reality mostly - JG A - 9/14 14:10:22
               George: "I haven't followed it closely" - Spanky KU - 9/14 14:20:11
                    I watched the tape moran - JG A - 9/14 14:21:37
                         Do you? - Spanky KU - 9/14 14:48:42
     Based on your thorough analysis of the law/evidence - mu7176grad MU - 9/14 13:29:12
          Yes I've looked at the evidence. How many bullets - MrBlueSky MU - 9/14 14:14:40
               I haven't followed closely but if Shockley's DNA is - JG A - 9/14 14:17:36
                    His DNA was on the gun that was recovered - MrBlueSky MU - 9/14 14:25:18
                         Then plain and simple he is guilty - JG A - 9/14 14:26:40
                              Lol, you're such an idiot. That fact stated, he could still - STL1DFW STL - 9/14 15:11:11
                                   The tape is pretty incriminating but - JG A - 9/14 15:24:01
                                        THIS - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/14 20:19:11
                                        Well, then he's not guilty if it's merely beyond a shadow & - STL1DFW STL - 9/14 15:57:24
                                             LOL - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/14 20:20:21
          He would have been the guy on a jury who went into - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/14 13:50:05
               I had a client once who served on a armed robbery jury - mu7176grad MU - 9/14 14:10:42
                    That's nothing. - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/14 20:23:15
     You mean the judge? (nm) - Sal KC - 9/14 13:07:53
          Yes, apologies. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 9/14 14:16:25
     lol no jury idiot. JG level dumb(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 9/14 13:05:34
          Imitation, no matter how delusional, is the most sincere - JG A - 9/14 13:08:30
               he may be the one poster more liberal than you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 9/14 13:11:04
                    LOL damn you are so - JG A - 9/14 13:14:09
                         RE: LOL I own you mullet - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 9/14 13:47:17
                              You definitely do, lol(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 9/14 15:12:31
                                   Cuddle tightly - JG A - 9/14 15:36:32
                              LOL - JG A - 9/14 13:48:40
     No jury - JG A - 9/14 13:02:02
          We actually use the reasonable doubt standard here. - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/14 20:28:19
          I agree (nm) - Sal KC - 9/14 13:08:18
     Following this closely, are you? - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/14 13:01:20
          Apologies. Bench trial thank you. - MrBlueSky MU - 9/14 13:03:36
               So you know all the evidence? - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/14 13:22:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard