 |
|
Sure thing, buttercup.
Posted on: September 7, 2017 at 13:47:06 CT
Badird MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1) Who is interfering with Earth correcting itself? Did I say that? No, we are simply dumping sequestered carbon into the atmosphere (in the form of burning oil) faster than Earth can correct for it.
2) What am I willing to do? Ive answered this question more times that I know. Tax credits for green initiatives, decreased nuclear regulations with smart disposal and recycling of nuclear waste, tax credits for small businesses in the sector. All of this is achievable with a small drop of discretionary spending. Perhaps, instead of increasing military funding, we could invest in the future of technology.
3) Higher taxes? No. I think there are still a lot of costs that could be cut to more than pay for anything I proposed.
4) Higher energy costs? How is this related? I pay Ameren out the *ss as it is. Id love tax credits for a solar roof, etc.
5) I never said 75%. Doesnt take away the fact that anthropogenic CO2 is one of the primary drivers of CC.
2) What am I willing to do? Ive answered this question more times that I know. Tax credits for green initiatives, decreased nuclear regulations with smart disposal and recycling of nuclear waste, tax credits for small businesses in the sector. All of this is achievable with a small drop of discretionary spending. Perhaps, instead of increasing military funding, we could invest in the future of technology.
3) Higher taxes? No. I think there are still a lot of costs that could be cut to more than pay for anything I proposed.
4) Higher energy costs? How is this related? I pay Ameren out the *ss as it is. Id love tax credits for a solar roof, etc.
5) I never said 75%. Doesnt take away the fact that anthropogenic CO2 is one of the primary drivers of CC.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Sure thing, buttercup. - Badird MU - 9/7 13:47:06