Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Wasn't the purpose of the travel ban to allow for a review

Posted on: May 25, 2017 at 19:42:01 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
of the vetting process & to implement "EXTREME VETTING"?

It's been 4 months - the length of time that the ban would have encompassed. If this was such an urgent need, the trump regime has had that 4 month period to review the process, identify weaknesses and implement remedies.

- Has the trump regime identified any weaknesses in the previous system?
- Why do we need a ban until Sept or Oct, when May-June was the original timeline?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The federal judiciary will have blood on its hands... - MUTGR MU - 5/25 19:25:43
     Oh please - mizzoumurfkc MU - 5/25 19:59:13
     Would someone tell me how in the holy hell the - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 19:58:16
     You think they will just rush right in, blow us up(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/25 19:52:55
          Yes. The folks doing that would. (nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 5/25 20:16:38
          And then you post stupid chit like this. - Coors4bob MU - 5/25 19:57:02
     RE: The federal judiciary will have blood on its hands... - patriot MU - 5/25 19:49:59
     Wasn't the purpose of the travel ban to allow for a review - tigerdb MU - 5/25 19:42:01
          Because the purpose was to ban - mizzoumurfkc MU - 5/25 19:57:33
               THEY AREN'T CITIZENS. If we can't even decide - GA Tiger MU - 5/25 20:06:24
          They have made changes - Coors4bob MU - 5/25 19:53:27
               Why is an additional ban needed then? - tigerdb MU - 5/25 19:58:53
          Well you know they won't allow a change to the vetting - tman KC - 5/25 19:50:11




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard