Welcome Guest

Most of these bureaucrats are very careful of

Posted on: May 18, 2017 at 13:20:31 CT

JG MU

Posts:

256994

Member For:

21.67 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

126

exactly what they say.

He could very well be meaning there was no obstruction of justice BUT that Trump tried to but didn't actually
obstruct anything. Thats just a conjecture but I'
m guessing a very good one

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

video of comey flat out saying there was no obstruction - blake1771 KC - 5/18 13:09:42

Not up to Comey(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/18 18:48:34

Facts are irrrelevant at this point - mu7176grad MU - 5/18 14:20:11

Technically, he said no one in the DoJ ever asked him to - Badird MU - 5/18 13:22:07

Most of these bureaucrats are very careful of - JG A - 5/18 13:20:31

oops(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 5/18 13:11:15

And besides the obstruction would be the firing - JG A - 5/18 13:22:46

and anyone with a modicum of common sense knows that - hefeweizen MU

- 5/18 13:24:42

We're talking about Trump here - JG A - 5/18 13:27:32

if he changes his testimony now, which is highly unlikely - blake1771 KC - 5/18 13:13:31

lying to congress not the same as perjury but yes(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 5/18 13:19:57

yes it is. if you are under oath it's perjury. - blake1771 KC - 5/18 14:08:45