Welcome Guest

Lets not be so limiting

Posted on: April 26, 2017 at 12:47:03 CT

Tigrrrr! MU

Posts:

262903

Member For:

23.64 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

He has no problem with anyone possessing child porn depicting pre-juveniles, juveniles, animal acts, etc.

Pickletopia is a very welcoming place.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Cops clearly guilty of profiling. - hokie VT - 4/26 11:29:18

Profilling of sorts is legal at U S entry points - Mo Texan MU - 4/26 12:01:21

RE: Cops clearly guilty of profiling. - MOCO SON MU - 4/26 11:44:54

Correct. Property rights - pickle MU

- 4/26 11:41:21

What about possession of child porn? - 615Tiger STL - 4/26 12:08:49

Or production of child porn? - Tigrrrr! MU

- 4/26 12:09:55

That would be an infringement of rights (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:20:46

impossible. Tigrrrr has seen your post supporting cornholing - SwampTiger MU - 4/26 12:26:21

Or his posts supporting cornholing boys in full view of - Tigrrrr! MU

- 4/26 12:49:55

I've never supported that. Link? (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/26 13:30:48

he is quite clear defining liberties - SwampTiger MU - 4/26 12:56:19

Tigrrrr is stupid - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:30:16

That is a great vote of confidence coming from you(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 4/26 12:44:00

Ok in what regard? (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:09:16

Any regard - 615Tiger STL - 4/26 12:16:57

I don't. - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:21:20

Just probing the depth of your property rights absolutism - 615Tiger STL - 4/26 12:23:25

Here, I'll help you out since you don't know how to ask - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:37:27

So exploitation of juveniles does not infringe their rights? - 615Tiger STL - 4/26 12:39:38

RE: So exploitation of juveniles does not infringe their rights? - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:50:29

Lets not be so limiting - Tigrrrr! MU

- 4/26 12:47:03

That's incorrect. I just said it's not ok - pickle MU

- 4/26 13:27:26

I've answered your questions - pickle MU

- 4/26 12:27:46