Welcome Guest

You should direct this post to DHighlander, hokie, and

Posted on: June 30, 2022 at 12:24:57 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
43950
Member For:
12.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Spanky, who have spent the entire morning trying to shift and evolve the interpretation of a particular clause that no one has ever seriously furthered (because the known original intent was and has been resolved).

And by the way, they are the ones suggesting that plain reading is all that matters.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Third Amendment - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:05:07
     It didn't stop the Federal gov't from appropriating homes, - BH O'bonga MU - 6/30 12:41:21
     I think so, yeah. Pretty sure. And - hokie VT - 6/30 12:20:42
          I've been told today that only the words matter, not intent. - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:26:24
               You cannot really separate words from intent - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:28:04
                    there can be ambiguity in the meaning of words though - SwampTiger MU - 6/30 13:10:04
                         I don't disagree with that - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 13:13:00
                              You’re missing the point (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 13:29:13
                                   "avoiding" - kmawv8 MU - 6/30 14:17:22
                                        accurate (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 14:44:46
               That's fine princess. Off you go. nm - hokie VT - 6/30 12:27:48
                    “I am happy to discuss things.” - pickle MU - 6/30 12:48:18
                         well, until he's fully owned - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:53:08
                    and there it is - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:30:28
     This will explain everything. - Emoji Man OU - 6/30 12:11:08
     I am not sure I follow - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:10:16
          DH said intent doesn’t matter; words matter - pickle MU - 6/30 12:23:22
               I don't think that's quite how it works. They were usually - TigerJackSwartz MU - 6/30 12:28:53
                    i don’t know the details - pickle MU - 6/30 14:08:44
                    I think pirates did that - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:31:05
          You start with a plain reading, and if there is an ambiguity - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:19:51
               And nothing speaks to intent like the clear use of words - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:22:10
                    You should direct this post to DHighlander, hokie, and - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:24:57
                         OK - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:26:15
                              Here's the person you should be discussing this with: - ummmm MU - 6/30 12:27:13
                                   For the record, I not only appreciate your thought process - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:48:11
                                        you're projecting big time - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:53:58
                                   I was addressing the person who used such a poor example - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 6/30 12:29:55
                                        It was a great example, you just jumped in - pickle MU - 6/30 12:44:51
                                        it was a perfect example - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:31:20
                    the debates in the legislatures were recorded (nm) - pickle MU - 6/30 12:23:58
     Sounds about right to me - DHighlander (nm) - ashtray UF - 6/30 12:07:43
     RE: Third Amendment - MOCO SON MU - 6/30 12:07:18




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard