Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
He hasn't appeared under oath
Posted on: December 13, 2019 at 15:11:18 CT
MrBlueSky
MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
19.30 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
otherwise he would have by now.
He lies every time he speaks, you know
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 14:59:37
LOL. nm.
-
MUTGR
MU
-
12/13 17:35:51
RE: The Case For Impeachment: Is this a joke?
-
BH O'bonga
MU
-
12/13 16:31:17
these are interesting reads in retrospect.
-
dangertim
MU
-
12/13 16:24:21
And the crime is...?
-
kp83
MU
-
12/13 15:37:19
Abuse of power, obstruction of justice. (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:48:14
Obstruction of Justice wasn't even one of the articles(nm)
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
12/13 18:11:24
Not crimes, just whines
-
kp83
MU
-
12/13 16:05:46
those aren't crimes (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:50:05
RE: those aren't crimes (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:51:02
that isn't an article ... you are one dishonest hack (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:51:44
RE: And the crime is...?
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
12/13 15:46:39
He will never answer that, since he can't. And the fact
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
12/13 15:43:46
I've answered it multiple times in this thread you ****ing
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:48:30
No you haven't
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:54:12
RE: The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming
-
scan
MU
-
12/13 15:34:11
If the dems weren’t all socialists,
-
Sarazen
MU
-
12/13 15:32:39
it's not. nobody but leftists care and all this will do is
-
blake1771
MU
-
12/13 15:28:21
blue also keeps confusing obstruction of justice
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:29:06
He has clearly obstructed justice many times as POTUS
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:34:07
so clear that Mueller couldn't even
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:35:42
I know how they work. And Trump has ignored them.
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:46:54
"you're fine with that"
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:49:43
The courts ruled
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:50:39
you really are dumb as hell (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:51:20
Why do you support a President ignoring congressional
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:56:59
and who has oversight over congress? and who has oversight
-
blake1771
MU
-
12/13 17:04:23
It's called checks and balances
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:59:14
CLEARLY? you sure about that? why don't you tell me the
-
blake1771
MU
-
12/13 15:34:54
He has stonewalled ALL congressional oversight
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:37:28
he has not stonewalled ALL congressional oversight since
-
blake1771
MU
-
12/13 15:40:00
An overwhelming case would have an actual
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:14:32
Abuse of power is 100% an impeachable offense
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:17:46
abuse of power is ill defined and is actually NOT
-
blake1771
MU
-
12/13 17:05:07
I never said it wasn't (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:19:11
False
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:15:55
I never said it wasn't
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:18:53
Which is? (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:21:30
There isn't any
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:26:22
Abuse of power is an impeachable offense (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:30:38
anything is an impeachable offense b/c it's political
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:31:52
In this case it should
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:34:28
No high crime or even a low misdemeanor in sight
-
Spanky
KU
-
12/13 15:08:11
Abuse of power, obstruction of justice. (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:08:49
obstruction of justice isn't one of the articles (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:31:15
You and I know that.
-
Tigrrrr!
MU
-
12/13 15:56:34
Nope... try again.
-
Spanky
KU
-
12/13 15:28:49
False (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:31:03
RE: The Case For Impeachment Is Overwhelming
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:06:02
LOL---good one
-
mu7176grad
MU
-
12/13 15:04:16
Notice the source (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:08:33
I wish the right would read the 4th article of impeachment
-
Hamdogg
KC
-
12/13 15:01:03
He does? You have a link for that?(nm)
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
12/13 15:11:42
That was attached to a crime (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:09:53
Trump claiming immunity is the exact same thing
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:10:38
lol wut?
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
12/13 15:12:27
He hasn't claimed executive privilege
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:13:56
So who decides legal conflicts between the Executive and
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
12/13 15:19:09
So go to court and compel him
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:15:12
RE: So go to court and compel him
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:17:27
The appeal is pending (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:18:24
You say that as though Trump will actually comply
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:40:32
If McGhan won't comply with the final court
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:46:24
That's not a given, failing to testify or honor a subpoena
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
12/13 15:59:18
All they have to do is expedite the case
-
ashtray
UF
-
12/13 15:22:42
And that article was voted down for Clinton (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:12:27
Yep
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:08:19
When did Trump commit perjury? (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:10:36
He hasn't appeared under oath
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:11:18
So then ... it doesn't apply to him (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:11:48
RE: So then ... it doesn't apply to him (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:12:24
Nope, that is for the courts to decide (nm)
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:13:05
And as I pointed out
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
12/13 15:15:10
And as I pointed out it's still pending
-
Sal
MU
-
12/13 15:18:11
Better off arguing with your dog
-
mu7176grad
MU
-
12/13 15:14:32