Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
Serous indictments for what?(nm)
Posted on: June 17, 2019 at 11:33:48 CT
raskolnikov
MU
Posts:
183088
Member For:
23.58 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
The CIA is running scared...
-
MUTGR
MU
-
6/17 10:58:12
Assuming the investigation is legit I only hope
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
6/17 11:29:32
Serous indictments for what?(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 11:33:48
Stick around and find out.(nm)
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
6/17 13:24:06
OMG !!! There's a memo coming !! Game Changer !!(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:37:40
Not sure how Barr will release the findings.(nm)
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
6/17 14:17:10
OK then(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 11:14:59
What do your sources in the IC tell you Rask, you are
-
MUTGR
MU
-
6/17 11:19:35
Blah blah blah CIA/FBI inquiry
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 11:33:14
It’s so weird (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
6/17 12:44:24
Why is it a waste of time to make sure the CIA and FBI
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 11:33:46
They didn't. They are fine. Thanks for coming(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 11:34:19
Your analysis is breathtaking. nm.
-
MUTGR
MU
-
6/17 11:38:06
In its concise nature, yes(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:00:06
you are immature (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
6/17 13:03:56
How do you know? (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 11:36:00
lol, Sal wants to be certain that the FBI didnt spy on ppl
-
Badird
MU
-
6/17 12:47:58
There was never evidence the Trump campaign did
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 12:52:19
Wasn't a question of illegal
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:03:12
what's illegal about having Russian contacts? (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 13:21:48
Jesus Lord man, Grow the fck up
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:40:44
it wasn't an inquiry, it was an investigation (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 14:04:11
Ha ha ha ha ha ha OK(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 18:12:28
Because I pay attention(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 11:36:40
No, please explain how you know for certain (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 11:37:24
Please explain ? You want me to please explain?
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:04:03
No you didn't (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 13:22:18
RE: No you didn't (nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 13:42:14
You have presented no findings (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
6/17 14:58:30
I don't care what you think. I find it absurd. Thanks
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
6/17 18:13:23
RE: You have presented no findings (nm)
-
scan
MU
-
6/17 15:24:29
RE: No, please explain how you know for certain (nm)
-
scan
MU
-
6/17 11:41:02
fyi, that’s what irrational looks like (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
6/17 12:45:32
RE: What do your sources in the IC tell you Rask, you are
-
scan
MU
-
6/17 11:21:33
Rask is one of the select few "in the know." nm.
-
MUTGR
MU
-
6/17 11:23:17
RE: Rask is one of the select few "in the know." nm.
-
scan
MU
-
6/17 11:25:27
But he's absolutely certain he's right. nm.
-
MUTGR
MU
-
6/17 11:28:52
Alright (nm)
-
DoltfromSTL
MU
-
6/17 11:17:26