 |
|
Exactly my thoughts. Even Nebraska was hard to stomach.
Posted on: October 16, 2018 at 11:45:07 CT
jake_mu MU
Posts:
3670
Member For:
12.30 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
But from the D side of things, not the O.
Short side of the field runs generated 200+ yards on the ground. We were missing Hamilton and the LB .. forget his name ... would have made a huge difference in the Run D. Ebner couldn't do it all on his own.
Their DE, Crick?, had an all-Big12 performance with pressures and sacks.
Their stupid g'd kicker couldn't miss.
But Gabbert, even though we lost, I thought played his best and put it all on the line for the W. Only to be screwed the following week with **** poor plays.
Didn't we try to punch it in on the ground on 4th and goal to go without a heavy formation against TTU? Settle for the FG and the game changes. Punch it in and it definitely changes.
****ing ridiculous.
Edited by jake_mu at 11:45:49 on 10/16/18
Short side of the field runs generated 200+ yards on the ground. We were missing Hamilton and the LB .. forget his name ... would have made a huge difference in the Run D. Ebner couldn't do it all on his own.
Their DE, Crick?, had an all-Big12 performance with pressures and sacks.
Their stupid g'd kicker couldn't miss.
But Gabbert, even though we lost, I thought played his best and put it all on the line for the W. Only to be screwed the following week with **** poor plays.
Didn't we try to punch it in on the ground on 4th and goal to go without a heavy formation against TTU? Settle for the FG and the game changes. Punch it in and it definitely changes.
****ing ridiculous.
Edited by jake_mu at 11:45:49 on 10/16/18
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Exactly my thoughts. Even Nebraska was hard to stomach. - jake_mu MU - 10/16 11:45:07